After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies are now reviving these types of systems. Out of lie recognition tools analyzed at the border to a system for verifying documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technologies is being used in asylum applications. This article explores just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals just how asylum seekers are transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to comply with a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their particular capacity to browse these devices and to follow their right for safeguards.

It also displays how these kinds of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They help the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from accessing the stations of safeguard. It further argues that analyses of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms for these technologies, by which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects exactly who are regimented by their dependence on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these technology have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double effect: whilst they assist to expedite the asylum process, they also help to make it difficult pertaining to refugees to navigate these systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental stars, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.